Agreements in Family Court Subject to Judicial Intervention

Stanton v. Sembrat

Docket No. A-5389-18T3

Decided May 22, 2020

Submitted by New Jersey Family Law Firm, Hark and Hark.

In a recent unpublished decision the Appellate Division reviewed $3,800 taken from a worker’s compensation settlement and placed to child support arrears, despite an agreement between the parties that defendant did not have to pay towards arrears.

In Stanton, the parties were married in 1995, had three children and were divorced in 2014. On April 13, 2018, the parties entered into an agreement, which was recorded by court order, that in part provided that “[d]efendant’s arrears payback shall be set at $0, to be revisited upon [the youngest child’s] emancipation.” Nonetheless, the Hunterdon County Probation Child Support Enforcement Unit intercepted a Worker’s Compensation settlement owed to defendant and sent $3800 to plaintiff, thereby reducing the more than $25,000 in arrears due prior to the April 2018 order.

Defendant sought reimbursement from plaintiff. He offered to stop paying $135 child support weekly until the $3800 was paid off. Plaintiff told the court she had spent the unexpected funds on necessities, had no funds to repay defendant and needed the weekly child support. The court did not grant defendant relief.

Defendant appealed. The Appellate Division ruled that family contracts are to be considered in the context of the circumstances at the time of drafting to apply a rational meaning in keeping the expressed general purpose.  Further, the law grants particular leniency to agreement made in the domestic arena allowing judges greater discretion when interpreting such agreements.  The Appellate Division found that despite the parties agreement, taking the money from the settlement was appropriate because of defendant’s significant arrears.

Most family matters are resolved with agreements including custody agreements, visitation schedules, alimony and child support amounts, property settlement agreements (PSAs), Matrimonial Settlement Agreements (MSAs) and civil restraints .  As clear from the decision above, Family Law judges have discretion to change agreements because of the nature of family court.  Therefore, it is vital to ensure your matter is resolved with the best solution, and protected by an agreement that has language to ensure that the agreement will remain intact, even if a judge were to review it.

At Hark & Hark, we help clients with prenups, divorce, custody, domestic violence, child support, alimony issues and more.

In recognition of these trying financial times due to COVID-19, we are reducing fees and working with clients to come up with manageable payment plans. While we combat Coronavirus, we are offering special deals for first responders and individuals currently working in the medical field.  Initial consultation is always free and we are available remotely.

We represent clients in all towns in New Jersey, including Aberdeen, Allenhurst, Allentown, Asbury Park, Atlantic Highlands, Avon-by-the-Sea, Belmar, Bradley Beach, Brielle, Colts Neck, Deal, Eatontown, Englishtown, Fair Haven, Farmingdale, Freehold borough, Freehold township, Hazlet, Highlands, Holmdel, Howell, Interlaken, Keansburg, Keyport, Little Silver, Loch Arbour, Long Branch, Manalapan, Manasquan, Marlboro, Matawan, Middletown, Millstone, Monmouth Beach, Neptune, Neptune City, Ocean, Oceanport, Red Bank, Roosevelt, Rumson, Sea Bright, Sea Girt, Shrewsbury borough, Shrewsbury township, South Belmar, Spring Lake Boro, Spring Lake Heights, Tinton Falls, Union Beach, Upper Freehold, Wall, and West Long Branch.

Stay safe.

Michael J. Collis, Esquire

Posted in

Criminal Civil Lawyer

Jeffrey Hark is a New Jersey Civil and Criminal Lawyer.

Leave a Comment