If You Have Not Been Charged with a Crime, Police Do Not Have to Inform You If You Are Arrested or If You Are a Suspect

State v. Wade Appellate Docket No.: A-4388-18T4 Decided November 23, 2020 Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. In an unpublished opinion, the Appellate Division of New Jersey reviewed whether a suspect’s statement made to police is admissible when he was wrongfully informed that he was not under arrest. In State v. Wade, a dark-colored…

Read More

Jury hearing “Out of Court consistent Statements” of a police officer used bolster his credibility ruled reversible error warranting a new trial!

State of New Jersey vs RICHARD D. GRAY, JR. appellate division decided March 20, 2019 Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. Facts At around 1 a.m. on November 8, 2014, Penns Grove Police Department Patrolman Christopher Hemple went to the One Stop Deli for a property check. Inside the store, Hemple recognized defendant.…

Read More

Can the police give a defendant his Miranda warnings in the car on the way to the police department captured on a mobile video recorder?

State of New Jersey v.  Richard Gray Jr. Appellate Division decided March 20, 2019 Facts: At around 1 a.m. on November 8, 2014, Penns Grove Police Department Patrolman Christopher Hemple went to the One Stop Deli for a property check. Inside the store, Hemple recognized defendant. Hemple knew there was an outstanding warrant for defendant.…

Read More

State v. GARY J. PASSARELLI. New Jersey Appellate Division December 17, 2018 How do I tell the police I want a Lawyer in New Jersey once I am arrested

State v. GARY J. PASSARELLI. Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. Facts: At approximately 4:00 p.m. on May 31, 2013, defendant was taken to the North Plainfield Police Department. He was questioned by Sergeant Michael Nugent and Detective Aaron Lacey from the Hunterdon County Prosecutor’s Office in an interview room that was video and…

Read More

State v. WInt NJ Supreme Court Decision Miranda is still alive in NJ

State v. Laurie Wint (A-28/29-17)(079660) Argued September 26, 2018 — Decided December 12, 2018 Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark Issue: Did Pennsylvania detectives violated Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981), by attempting to question defendant Laurie Wint in Camden and later questioning him in Pennsylvania after he earlier requested counsel. The Court…

Read More

Miranda Issues and Cell Phone Search Issues

Issue:  Did a Hispanic individual make a knowing and voluntary waiver 1) of his right to remain silent and2)  not consent to a search of his ‘entire’ cell phone and ‘all its systems’?  What is the State’s burden of proof required “in order to admit the defendant’s statement at the time of trial and the evidence…

Read More