Weiner 1961 discussion: Can Manslaughter be considered a moral turpitude if…

Weiner 1961 discussion: Can Manslaughter considered a moral turpitude violation when it involves ‘the absence of intent’ and is defined as criminal negligence… or rather ‘knew or should have known’ awareness of a risk of injury or death…… Submitted by New Jersey Criminal Lawyer, Jeffrey Hark. What is “moral turpitude”? It has been defined as…

Read More

Evidence: Probative Value v. Prejudicial Effect on the Scale of Justice

Submitted by Criminal Defense Attorney, Jeffrey Hark. State v. Fereirra decided on May, 7 2014 was an appeal to the N.J. Superior Court, Appellate Division, that considered the balance between the probative value of evidence submitted and the prejudicial effect it has on the jury. By prejudicial effect what is meant is that some evidence…

Read More